Case of biventricular hypertrophy and biventricular failure. Hypertrophy often indicates some degree of diastolic dysfunction with altered filling properties and compliance of the ventricles. As such, these patients are susceptible to increased heart rate, during which the filling time is impaired.
May 6, 2025
November 27, 2025 - We now made available the NH-TNE Teaching on Neonatal Hypertension by Dr. Joseph Mancini (Nephrologist at the Montreal Children’s Hospital) recorded on November 27, 2025. In this educational lecture, Dr. Mancini reviews: Definition and thresholds of neonatal hypertension; Common causes and risk factors in preterm and term infants; Diagnostic workup and blood pressure measurement best practices; Acute vs. chronic management strategies; Collaborative approach between neonatology, nephrology, cardiology & hemodynamics teams. This session is part of the NeoCardioLab educational series dedicated to advancing neonatal hemodynamics practice through shared knowledge and accessible training materials. Slides available as PDF as well.
Some preterm infants—particularly those with bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD)—may develop significant systemic hypertension, defined as blood pressure exceeding the 95th percentile for postmenstrual age (as per established references - Dionne et al.). This condition may result from a combination of elevated systemic vascular resistance (SVR), prior acute kidney injury, increased vascular stiffness, or exposure to corticosteroids. Systemic hypertension can contribute to left ventricular (LV) remodeling, increased LV stiffness, ongoing adaptation with LV hypertrophy and elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP), which may subsequently raise left atrial (LA) pressure and impair pulmonary venous drainage—thereby exacerbating pulmonary vascular disease. Indeed, Laplace's law, in the context of the heart, explains how the heart compensates for increased workload through hypertrophy. When the heart faces increased afterload (like from high blood pressure / high systemic vascular resistances) or volume overload, it responds by thickening its walls (hypertrophy). This thickening, according to Laplace's law, helps to normalize the stress on the heart muscle caused by the increased pressure or volume. However, this adaptation has limits, and excessive hypertrophy can lead to heart failure
When evaluating the right ventricular (RV)/pulmonary arterial compartment in relation to the LV/aortic compartment, whether through septal morphology or shunt directionality (e.g., across post-tricuspid defects), it is essential to interpret findings within the broader context of systemic hemodynamics. Elevated systemic blood pressure may lead to underestimation or mischaracterization of pulmonary hypertension (PH). For example, an infant may have elevated RV and pulmonary artery pressures, but the LV may appear round at peak systole—suggestive not of low RV afterload, but of concurrent systemic hypertension. Similarly, a VSD or PDA may shunt left to right because of high systemic vascular resistance relative to pulmonary vascular resistances (even if the PVR and/or PA pressures are elevated). As such, a right to left post-tricuspid shunt may not be present, despite elevated PVR and/or RV/PA pressures in the setting of high SVR and/or LV/PA pressures.
Similarly, the right ventricle (RV) may be exposed to elevated afterload with associated remodeling and reduced compliance. Concurrently, the LV may exhibit hypertrophy and diastolic dysfunction secondary to systemic hypertension, resulting in even greater impairment in LV compliance. In this setting, a left-to-right shunt at the atrial level may persist or become more prominent, despite elevated right ventricular end-diastolic pressure (RVEDP), due to the relatively higher left atrial pressures driven by impaired LV filling. As such, the expected bidirectional or right ot left shunting at the atrial level may not be present. This paradox underscores the importance of comprehensive assessment of biventricular relaxing/filling properties, shunt physiology, and systemic hemodynamics when interpreting TnECHO findings in infants with complex cardiopulmonary interactions.
In patients with suspected or confirmed systemic hypertension, early involvement of nephrology is advised. Evaluation should include abdominal ultrasound with renal Doppler to assess for renovascular pathology, and serial monitoring of renal biomarkers and electrolytes (plasma and urine creatinine, urine and serum electrolytes). Antihypertensive therapy should be tailored to the clinical context, with agents such as angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (e.g., enalapril) and diuretics (e.g., hydrochlorothiazide, spironolactone) considered based on renal function, volume status, and hemodynamic profile.
Anti-Hypertensive Medications can be found in the Cardiovascular Agents section.
What are the causes of hypertension in neonates?Similar to the causes of hypertension in pediatric population with few additional differential specific for this age.
Renal: Renal artery thrombosis (particularly if a UAC has been in place); renal vein thrombosis; renal artery stenosis or compression (e.g., from tumor or post–tight abdominal wall closure); parenchymal renal disease – congenital (ARPKD, ADPKD) or acquired (acute tubular necrosis from poor perfusion, e.g., sepsis, asphyxia); renal hypoplasia; severely obstructed urinary tract; idiopathic arterial calcification; congenital rubella syndrome; hemolytic uremic syndrome; very low birth weight (VLBW) infants – low renal mass, impaired nephrogenesis, or nephrocalcinosis.
Cardiovascular: Coarctation of the aorta; distal aortic thrombosis (particularly if a UAC has been in place); fluid overload; vascular stiffness (example in IUGR).
Endocrine: Congenital adrenal hyperplasia; hyperaldosteronism; hyperthyroidism; adrenal hemorrhage; hypercalcemia; hyperthyroidism.
Chronic Lung Disease: May present later, sometimes after NICU discharge.
Medications: Steroids; adrenergic agents; total parenteral nutrition (TPN) leading to salt/water overload or hypercalcemia.
Neurological: Pain; seizures; intracranial hypertension; drug withdrawal; hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE).
References
Dionne JM, Abitbol CL, Flynn JT. Hypertension in infancy: diagnosis, management and outcome. Pediatr Nephrol. 2012 Jan;27(1):17-32. doi: 10.1007/s00467-010-1755-z. Epub 2011 Jan 22. Erratum in: Pediatr Nephrol. 2012 Jan;27(1):159-60. PMID: 21258818.
Sehgal, A., Elsayed, K., Nugent, M. et al. Sequelae associated with systemic hypertension in infants with severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia. J Perinatol 42, 775–780 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-022-01372-y
Reyes-Hernandez ME, Bischoff AR, Giesinger RE, Rios DR, Stanford AH, McNamara PJ. Echocardiography Assessment of Left Ventricular Function in Extremely Preterm Infants, Born at Less Than 28 Weeks' Gestation, With Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia and Systemic Hypertension. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2024 Feb;37(2):237-247. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2023.08.013. Epub 2023 Aug 22. PMID: 37619910.
Sehgal A, Krishnamurthy MB, Clark M, Menahem S. ACE inhibition for severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia - an approach based on physiology. Physiol Rep. 2018 Sep;6(17):e13821. doi: 10.14814/phy2.13821. PMID: 30187692; PMCID: PMC6125606.
Stanford AH, Reyes M, Rios DR, Giesinger RE, Jetton JG, Bischoff AR, McNamara PJ. Safety, Feasibility, and Impact of Enalapril on Cardiorespiratory Physiology and Health in Preterm Infants with Systemic Hypertension and Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction. J Clin Med. 2021 Sep 29;10(19):4519. doi: 10.3390/jcm10194519. PMID: 34640535; PMCID: PMC8509219.
Pattnaik P, Shah M, Verma RP. Neonatal Hypertension. [Updated 2025 Sep 15]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK563223/
Sweep in parasternal long axis outlining that the aortic and pulmonary valve are opening and closing (no atresia - anatomical or functional)
Parasternal short axis outlining the biventricular hypertrophy. The RV seems to be "rocking" and with poor systolic contraction. The septum is dyskinetic with paradoxical movements. The LV free wall also appears to have areas of regional dysfunction.
In this patient, there is systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve - an indicator of LV hypertrophy. There is intra-cavitary acceleration of flow by colour. There is mitral regurgitation. The estimated peak LV pressure in systole is up to 84 mmHg by CW-Doppler.
LV hypertrophy in parasternal long axis with septal hypertrophy
Some degree of systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve. Septal hypertrophy.
Some dynamic obstruction secondary to the septal hypertrophy
Intra-cavitary acceleration with mitral insufficiency.
CW-Doppler estimating the peak systolic LV pressure by mitral insufficiency and capturing some of the intra-cavitary acceleration.
Mitral insufficiency - possibly secondary to the distortion of the mitral apparatus due to the LV hypertrophy. One may also appreciate some degree of RV hypertrophy.
LV inflow CW-Doppler with some Dagger-Shaped negative signal obtained from the ejection phase towards the LVOT, outlining intra-cavitary acceleration and dynamic obstruction.
Biventricular hypertrophy appreciated in diastole.
E/A (two measurements) outlining impaired relaxation from the hypertrophy where A is much higher than the E velocity.
Hypertrophy at mid-papillary muscle level in PSAX. We can appreciate that the pillar are hypertrophied, as well as there is circumferential hypertrophy. We can appreciate in diastole and systole.
Below - still frames of the flow into the LV cavity showcasing the acceleration from inflow to outflow tract. However, we can appreciate that there is flow from below the LVOT feeding post-aortic valve the ascending aorta.
M-Mode showcasing hypertrophy in the PLAX. We can also appreciate some SAM in systole.
PLAX zoom in the LVOT - flow accelerated just below the aortic valve but passing through the LVOT. This is because of dynamic obstruction within the cavity during contraction.
Short axis with significant circumferential hypertrophy of the LV, as well as some hypertrophy of the papillary muscles
Parasternal long axis outlining LV hypertrophy and septal hypertrophy.
3D volumes showing circumferential hypertrophy
Acceleration in the LV outflow tract (dynamic sub-aortic acceleration from the septal hypertrophy). There is pseudo (incomplete) systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve. There is also some degree of RV hypertrophy.
Tilted 4 chamber view to evaluate the LVOT with a posterior sweep showing that the papillary muscles are hypertrophied.
Nyquist (velocity filter) at 148 cm/s. Less aliasing but still some subjective acceleration at the LVOT. The LVOT is narrowed from the dynamic contraction of the septum and some degree of pseudo-SAM (systolic anterior motion of mitral valve).
Focus and zoom on the LVOT
LVOT view. Filling seems preserved in diastole.
Intracavitary acceleration at a Nyquist of 92.4 cm/s.
Intra-cavitary acceleration with some degree of mild miltral insufficiency.
The RV hypertrophy is appreciated in this tilted 4 chamber view with some RV focus.
Parasternal long axis. One with a zoom on the LVOT / Aortic valve. The other one with colour showing some mitral regurgitation.
Parasternal long axis. One with a zoom on the LVOT / Aortic valve. The other one with colour showing some mitral regurgitation. One may also appreciate some degree of RVOT free wall hypertrophy.
Some images below (frozen) showing some pseudo-systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve, associated with mitral regurgitation and some acceleration in the left ventricular outflow tract.
Significant hypertrophy appreciated from the parasternal long axis view. The hypertrophy is septal and at the level of the LV free wall. The LV cavity is almost completely obliterated.
Colour clips indicating acceleration of flow in the out flow tract.
Seep in the parasternal long axis with colour. The RV may be seen with some degree of hypertrophy and filling by colour.
Parasternal short axis view outlining the significant hypertrophy.
Another sweep in the parasternal short axis view. The Aortic valve may be seen. It seems to open and close and be tri-leaflet.
Significant hypertrophy observed in the apical 4 chamber view. There is "kissing" ventricular walls.
There is mitral insufficiency by colour flow.
Acceleration of flow at the level of the LV outflow tract. There is filling of the aorta with flow that seems to originate from below the valve (not retrograde from the ductus)
There is some degree of RV hypertrophy with some tricuspid insufficiency and intra-cavitary acceleration by colour (although the Nyquist is at 61 cm/s)
This view outlines well the biventricular hypertrophy with the significant septal hypertrophy.
Subcostal view.
Subcostal short axis view. Outlining the RVOT with flow through the pulmonary valve.
Flow may be seen in the descending aorta.
Inflow PW-Doppler.
M-Mode in the parasternal long axis view outlining the significant hypertrophy of the septum and the posterior wall.
LV Intra-cavitary peak gradient of at least 81 mmHg estimated by CW-Doppler
RV Intra-cavitary peak gradient of at least 33 mmHg estimated by CW-Doppler. The “Dagger-Shaped” Doppler Signal.
On spectral Doppler echocardiography, a distinctive dagger-shaped waveform is a hallmark of dynamic muscular obstruction, typically seen in the ventricular outflow tracts.
This curved, late-peaking Doppler envelope reflects a progressive acceleration of blood flow due to dynamic narrowing during systole, most commonly observed in:
Left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), where systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve and septal hypertrophy produce a characteristic dagger-shaped spectral profile.
Right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) obstruction, particularly in infants with unrepaired Tetralogy of Fallot (TOF). Here, continuous-wave Doppler may reveal:
A curved dagger-like contour, indicating dynamic muscular obstruction.
A triangular contour, typically reflecting fixed obstruction at the pulmonary valve level.
Recognizing this spectral morphology is essential, as it helps differentiate dynamic intramyocardial obstruction from fixed anatomical stenosis and can guide clinical interpretation in both congenital and acquired cardiac conditions.
Dagger-Shaped in the LV cavity CW-Doppler.
TR of 37 by CW-Doppler
Measurement of the septum by 2D (B-mode) Echocardiography
Parasternal long axis outlining the biventricular hypertrophy, with some septal hypertrophy.
Parasternal short axis outlining the biventricular hypertrophy, with some septal hypertrophy. There is flattening of the interventricular septum at the peak of systole.
Apical 4 chamber view. There is subjective paradoxical movement of the septum, although this view is not the most optimal to appreciate that.
Colour box outlines the tricuspid regurgitant jet. There is also flow going through the LVOT to the aorta.
5 chamber view (tilted)
The patent ductus arteriosus is bidirectional, right to left in systole.
Inter-atrial communications that are mainly left to right.
Subcostal view. one may appreciate that the blood flow is going through the aortic valve to the ascending aorta, at the level of the LVOT.
See more in Example case of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HOCM)
SAM in dynamic left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction results from a combination of the Venturi effect (upper right) and drag forces (lower right). In hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, the mitral valve leaflets are elongated and abnormally anteriorly displaced (increased α angle), making drag forces the dominant mechanism driving leaflet motion toward the septum. Inspired from reference: Geske, Jeffrey B., et al. "Septal reduction therapies in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: comparison of surgical septal myectomy and alcohol septal ablation." Interventional cardiology 6.2 (2014): 199.
Below, we address strategies regarding newborns who develop a low–cardiac output state driven by dynamic left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction in the setting of poor left ventricular filling due to significant cardiac hypertrophy, leading to systemic hypoperfusion. The content emphasizes physiologic stabilization, careful preload optimization, avoidance of inotropic strategies that exacerbate obstruction, heart-rate control, afterload support, and the role of targeted neonatal echocardiography to guide real-time decision-making and monitor response to therapy. Of course, these concepts must be individualized to the clinical context and integrated into a holistic evaluation and management approach, ideally within a multidisciplinary team. Management requires frequent reassessment and continuous evaluation of the physiologic response, with particular attention to avoiding polypharmacy and potentially detrimental side effects. The judicious use of any medication or strategy should always be guided by careful bedside assessment, grounded in a clear understanding of the underlying physiology and the infant’s dynamic response to the treatment plan.
Managing a newborn with Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy (HOCM) and hemodynamic instability is a high-stakes balancing act. Unlike typical neonatal shock, the goal here is not to increase contractility, but rather to reduce obstruction and optimize diastolic filling, leading to improved systemic output. In HOCM, one of the issues is Systolic Anterior Motion (SAM) of the mitral valve, where the valve is sucked into the narrowed Left Ventricular Outflow Tract (LVOT) during systole, causing a dynamic obstruction. Another concern is the decreased left ventricular compliance, leading to raised LV end-diastolic pressure and possibly post-capillary pulmonary hypertension (this can present with significant pulmonary edema, and left to right restrictive inter-atrial shunting - depending on presence/size of the defect). These patients may present with pulmonary venous congestion.
Strategies
Preload Management
Goal: Keep the ventricle "full" to stent the LVOT open.
Purpose: Increasing the end-diastolic volume physically pushes the septum and mitral valve apart, reducing the degree of obstruction.
Advantage: Most "physiologic" way to reduce the gradient without using drugs.
Watch for: Over-distension leading to pulmonary edema, though these patients usually require higher-than-normal filling pressures (CVP 8–12 mmHg).
Judicious use of fluid bolus and maintenance fluid. While it is reasonable to avoid dehydration, excessive fluid administration can be detrimental as well. Some of these infants are infants of diabetic mother and are already on a supra-physiological total fluid intake due to the high glucose intake required to maintain normoglycemia.
Vasopressors (Increasing Systemic Afterload)
Agents: Phenylephrine, Vasopressin (sometimes norepinephrine = although it may have the undesirable side effect of increasing chronotropy and, as such, less favoured)
Purpose: To increase Systemic Vascular Resistance (SVR). A higher afterload "back-pressures" the LVOT, helping to keep it open. It also delays LVOT opening which allows to increase modestly the filling time.
Advantage: Phenylephrine is a pure alpha-agonist; it slows the heart rate (reflexively) and increases afterload without increasing contractility. Vasopressin is excellent for hypotension without affecting the heart rate or inotropy. Vasopressin may increase the risk of hyponatremia (theoretically), that can be present especially in infants of diabetic mother exposed to high total fluid intake due to glucose issues.
Watch for: Excessive vasoconstriction leading to decreased organ perfusion or gut ischemia.
Beta-Blockers
Agents: Esmolol (acute/titratable), Propranolol (maintenance).
Purpose: To decrease heart rate (increasing diastolic filling time). However, they may have some inherent negative inotropy properties. While this can reduce the "venturi effect" that causes SAM, it can also lead to altered ventricular function (especially if there is concomittant RV dysfunction in the context of high PVR status).
Advantage: Esmolol is short-acting and can be turned off quickly if the baby decompensates.
Watch for: Bradycardia and hypotension. Beta-blockers are contraindicated if there is overt low-output heart failure without significant LVOT obstruction. It is also agents that can induce bronchospasm.
Ventilation and Sedation
Purpose: To reduce the work of breathing and metabolic demand.
Strategy: Maintain high-normal CO2 to avoid tachycardia. Positive Pressure Ventilation (PPV) should be used carefully, as high mean airway pressures can decrease preload (venous return), which worsens HOCM.
Sedation and anelgesia (especially with agents like dexmedetomidine) should be considered to reduce metabolic demand and heart rate, avoid increase adrenergic stimulation such as with crying. Release of catecholamines will increase contractility, worsening the obstruction, and increase heart rate (decreases filling time)
What to Avoid: Inotropes
Agents: Epinephrine, Dobutamine, Dopamine (and even Norepinephrine if you have access to other vasopressors without chronotropic effect).
The Rationale: These should generally be avoided or used with extreme caution because of their increasing heart rate capacity.
The Danger: Increasing contractility (positive inotropy) or heart rate (positive chronotropy) worsens the LVOT obstruction and SAM, creating a "spiral" where the harder the heart pumps, the less blood actually leaves the ventricle.
Norepinephrine: While it has alpha effects, its beta-1 activity can worsen the gradient. Only use if SVR is dangerously low and phenylephrine/vasopressin is insufficient.
Milrinone:
In the context of severe HOCM with hemodynamic instability, milrinone is generally avoided and should be approached with caution. Milrinone is an "inodilator"—it increases contractility (inotropy) and decreases systemic vascular resistance (vasodilation). In a HOCM patient, both of these actions are less desirable. Strengthening the ventricular squeeze increases the velocity of blood through the narrow LVOT. This creates a stronger Venturi effect, which pulls the mitral valve into the septum (SAM), worsening the obstruction. Dropping the systemic blood pressure by reduction of SVR and LV afterload can reduce the "back-pressure" that helps keep the LVOT open (and make the LVOT open earler limiting filling time). A lower afterload allows the ventricle to empty more forcefully and completely, which makes the obstruction more severe.
Milrinone is also a lusitropic agent that improves relaxation - which is the only potential benefit in this physiology. However, this benefit is almost always outweighed by the risks of increased SAM and hypotension. Despite the risks, Milrinone is sometimes considered in very specific, complex neonatal cases (such as an infant of a diabetic mother with HOCM and concurrent PPHN). If used, it is almost always paired with a Beta-blocker (like Esmolol) to counteract the increased contractility and heart rate, as well as with a vasopressor (vasopressin or phenylephrine) while still getting the benefits of relaxation (diastolic lusitropy).
PGE
In the context of severe HOCM, Prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) is not typically a first-line therapy because HOCM is an intramyocardial structural disease, not a classic "ductal-dependent" lesion. However, in a newborn with hemodynamic collapse, its role is nuanced and depends entirely on the secondary consequences of the hypertrophied muscle. If the hypertrophy is so massive that it causes Critical Left Ventricular Outflow Tract (LVOT) Obstruction, the baby may present exactly like a "Left-Sided Obstructive Lesion" (e.g., Critical Aortic Stenosis). PGE1 can be used to maintain systemic perfusion via the Ductus Arteriosus (Right-to-Left shunting). If the LV cannot pump blood past the obstruction to the body, a patent ductus allows the Right Ventricle (RV) to take over systemic circulation.
The "RV Pop-off": In cases where HOCM is associated with severe Pulmonary Hypertension (PPHN), keeping the ductus open acts as a "pressure-relief valve" for the RV, preventing right-sided heart failure.
If the LVOT is significantly obstructed by the septum and SAM, the baby will die of cardiogenic shock without a ductus to provide systemic blood flow.
As such, it can buy time to start Esmolol, vasopressor therapy and/or volume resuscitation.
The Risks: Vasodilation - PGE1 is a potent systemic vasodilator. As discussed with Milrinone, dropping SVR is not desirable in HOCM. If the ductus is open but the SVR drops too low, it can worsen the LVOT obstruction and "steal" blood away from the coronary arteries. Like all neonates on PGE1, there is a high risk of apnea requiring intubation. You can also get hypotension from the drug's direct effect, which then triggers tachycardia—and tachycardia is the enemy of HOCM filling
Pulmonary Vasodilators (iNO)
Use with extreme caution, or not at all.
Purpose: To treat concomittant pulmonary hypertension.
The Risk: Inhaled Nitric Oxide (iNO) reduces Right Ventricular (RV) afterload. This can increase venous return to the left atrium, which is good, but it can also decrease the "splinting" effect the RV has on the septum, potentially worsening LVOT obstruction. It will promote left to right shunting at the ductal level, while many of these patients need some degree of right to left shunting if there is insufficient systemic flow due to the dynamic LVOT obstruction and reduction in LVO.
Verdict: Generally avoided unless there is documented, severe PPHN that is the primary driver of instability. If the PFO is left to right, it informs that the LA pressure is higher than the RA pressure, and as such iNO should be avoided.
ECMO (The Last Resort)
Purpose: To provide total circulatory support when medical management fails to relieve the LVOT gradient or maintain perfusion.
VA-ECMO Unloads the heart and ensures end-organ perfusion.